[seqfan] Re: Reproducing A064690 (sign changes of a rational fraction iteration)

[Hugo Pfoertner]

I've uploaded a plot of x-values versus n to the sequence, but haven't made
any other changes yet.
https://oeis.org/A064690/a064690.png

On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 9:24 AM Hugo Pfoertner <yae9911 at gmail.com> wrote:

> My results beyond 10^6 remain stable also with \p 20000 and \p 50000, but
> it would be good if someone could independently verify this.
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 8:20 AM Lucas Brown <lucasbrown.cit at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Using Python's gmpy2.mpfr data type with 10,000,000 bits, I checked up to
>> 60,000 and got the same results as Hugo Pfoertner.
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 10:17 PM Hugo Pfoertner <yae9911 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Sorry, forgot to delete one of the progress markers, "-111", from the
>> list
>> > for n>10^6
>> >
>> > --
>> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>