[seqfan] A194945

Peter Munn techsubs at pearceneptune.co.uk
Wed May 3 03:31:50 CEST 2023


A194945	claims to be "Position of records in A194943", but its data seems
to have been produced by its program, which is clearly designed to produce
a valuable, but different, sequence: the positions of records in A034693
(Smallest k such that k*n+1 is prime).

I guess we have both record sequences going forward, but which should
A194945 be? Generally I believe the rule is to follow the data, but does
the rule apply when the name is so explicitly a different sequence?

Best regards,

Peter



More information about the SeqFan mailing list