[seqfan] Re: A194945

[Neil Sloane]

I asked Charles Greathouse to deal with this question (concerning A194945).

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, Chairman, OEIS Foundation.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University,
Email: njasloane at gmail.com



On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:39 AM Peter Munn <techsubs at pearceneptune.co.uk>
wrote:

> A194945 claims to be "Position of records in A194943", but its data seems
> to have been produced by its program, which is clearly designed to produce
> a valuable, but different, sequence: the positions of records in A034693
> (Smallest k such that k*n+1 is prime).
>
> I guess we have both record sequences going forward, but which should
> A194945 be? Generally I believe the rule is to follow the data, but does
> the rule apply when the name is so explicitly a different sequence?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>