Further seqs with leading zeros

[N. J. A. Sloane]

Here are two more edited sequences that DWW identified as containing
leading 0's:


%I A037244
%S A037244 3,14,15,92,65,35,89,79,32,38,46,26,43,38,32,79,50,28,84,19,71,69,39,93,
%T A037244 75,10,58,20,97,49,44,59,23,7,81,64,6,28,62,8,99,86,28,3,48,25,34,
%U A037244 21,17,6,79,82,14,80,86,51,32,82,30,66,47,9,38,44,60,95,50,58,22,31
%N A037244 a(0) = 3; other terms are formed from pairs of successive digits in decimal expansion of Pi.
%K A037244 nonn,base,easy,more
%O A037244 0,1
%A A037244 Chung Wa, Ho (chungwa at netvigator.com)
%e A037244 Pi = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582...

%I A016062
%S A016062 3,14,15,92,653,5897,9323,84626,433832,795028,841971,6939937,
%T A016062 51058209,494459230,781640628
%N A016062 Write down decimal expansion of Pi; divide up into chunks of minimal length so that chunks are increasing numbers and do not begin with 0.
%K A016062 nonn,easy,base,more
%O A016062 0,1
%A A016062 Robert G. Wilson v (rgwv at kspaint.com)
%e A016062 Pi = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582...



David had said:

>Back when I started working on the EIS, I understood that the only allowable
>sequence elements were in standard decimal form, that is, leading zeroes
>must be stripped from elements.  I find the following sequences in which
>some elements have leading zeroes:
>
>A016062
>A026127
>A035331
>A037244
>A055618
>A056501
>A059856
>A060936
>A061065
>A061111
>Has this rule been relaxed, or should the offending sequences be fixed?
>


I am going to fix the others too, though i won't post any more here


NJAS