Suggestion for "more" page.

[Jud McCranie]

At 06:08 PM 8/7/2005, David Wilson wrote:
>I'm back to looking at the "more" sequences for extension.  It would be 
>nice to be able to distingish easy "more" sequences, which probably can be 
>extended with modest effort, from hard "more" sequences, which probably 
>cannot be extended without major effort.
>
>To this end, I propose that the "more" page classify "more" sequences 
>according to whether the "hard" keyword also appears.  This could be done 
>by having two sections of the page, or else coloring the links.  Then I 
>(and others, if interested) could concentrate their efforts on sequences 
>that can in fact be reasonably extended.

I think that is a good idea.