Semi-voluntary moratorium on OEIS submissions?

[Alonso Del Arte]

I think that's a good idea, Antti. Besides, it would give a good use to the
Draft E-Mail folders of our e-mail accounts.
 However, the voluntary moratorium ought not apply to corrections. If I spot
a mistake in a sequence already in the table, I will send it in right away
before I forget about it.
 Alonso

 On 9/29/05, Antti Karttunen <antti.karttunen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> N. J. A. Sloane wrote:
>
> >Seqfans, I was away for a week, got home on the red-eye
> >at 2am today. But at 11pm last night, the Uninterruptable Power Supply
> (or UPS)
> >in the Labs' building failed, and it took them 18 hours to fix it.
> >
> >I apologize for this.
> >
> >I'm also VERY far behind now in processing new sequences
> >and updates.
> >
> >
> >
> How about a "semi-voluntary moratorium on a submission of a new
> sequences and updates"
> for say, a week or a month, or at least until Neil has cleaned the rush
> (*) and
> taken a deep breath after the task?
> Otherwise this seems to me like an abuse of a single person's resources.
> (Take heed, the most compulsive submitters...)
>
> (* with the "Associate Editors" helping as much as they can...)
>
> >NJAS
> >
> >
> >
>
> Yours,
>
> Antti
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermail/seqfan/attachments/20050930/43fee52a/attachment-0001.htm>