request for advice

[Ralf Stephan]

David Wilson: 
> These issues could all be addressed by a review process.  Incoming 
> submissions would be added to a submission database, and would not pass 
> into the OEIS proper until they were properly reviewed.  The review process 
> would be supported by software that eases the review process and enforces 
> standards.

That's why I like zak's scheme: save all rejected sequences in
the file rejected.txt so they can be looked at. If there is only
one other person speaking in behalf of one sequence, accept it.


ralf