?nsar, ganso, oca: COMMENT on A 020988 = A084180 = A108018 !
Ralf Stephan
ralf at ark.in-berlin.de
Sat Sep 2 08:40:42 CEST 2006
> >=Antti Karttunen <antti.karttunen at gmail.com>
> > Please use that Lookup-feature of the database before submitting,
> with the first or two entries of your "new" sequence omitted!
>
> I agree that it would be excellent for everyone to always be more
> careful with submissions.
>
> However wouldn't it be a good idea to *automatically* subject ALL
> submissions to an application of superseeker, or some variant thereof?
Before: Submitter sends a new definition with an old sequence. Later
the sequence is found duplicate but the definition is merged into the
original sequence.
After: Submitter gets her sequence rejected. Frustrated, she never
submits her definition to the original sequence.
ralf
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list