?nsar, ganso, oca: COMMENT on A 020988 = A084180 = A108018 !

Ralf Stephan ralf at ark.in-berlin.de
Sat Sep 2 08:40:42 CEST 2006


> >=Antti Karttunen <antti.karttunen at gmail.com>
> > Please use that Lookup-feature of the database before submitting, 
> with the first or two entries of your "new" sequence omitted!
> 
> I agree that it would be excellent for everyone to always be more 
> careful with submissions.
> 
> However wouldn't it be a good idea to *automatically* subject ALL 
> submissions to an application of superseeker, or some variant thereof?

Before: Submitter sends a new definition with an old sequence. Later
the sequence is found duplicate but the definition is merged into the
original sequence.

After: Submitter gets her sequence rejected. Frustrated, she never
submits her definition to the original sequence.


ralf







More information about the SeqFan mailing list