?nsar, ganso, oca: COMMENT on A 020988 = A084180 = A108018 !

[Marc LeBrun]

I agree; automatically running superseeker should be implemented so as to only
be an enhancement of the current system.

The automation can be at least as polite and encouraging as the 
existing process.

There are many options: for example it could behave for the submitter 
exactly as
it does now, and just quietly append a section with the analysis for 
the editors
(say as a block of lines tagged %$ or something).

But I think it would be nice to give the submitter the feedback.  I'd 
welcome it.

Most entries to the OEIS should have had superseeker run on them at some point
before submission anyway.  It does, after all, espouse reference 
quality standards.

Perhaps there could be a check box (defaultly selected) "Run 
Superseeker Review"?