[seqfan] A169828: more terms? in pairs (6k,6k+1)?

zak seidov zakseidov at yahoo.com
Mon May 31 20:35:31 CEST 2010

Previous message (by thread): [seqfan] Re: Annotated version of "What's Special About This Number?" (Part 0) ... (Part 9)
Next message (by thread): [seqfan] Re: A169828: more terms? in pairs (6k,6k+1)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

1. No more terms <12*10^9.
   Anyone care to check/extend this?

2. Is suggestion that entries appears in pairs 
  (6k,6k+1) OK? At least first six entries are.

3. Thanks, Zak

Previous message (by thread): [seqfan] Re: Annotated version of "What's Special About This Number?" (Part 0) ... (Part 9)
Next message (by thread): [seqfan] Re: A169828: more terms? in pairs (6k,6k+1)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the SeqFan mailing list