[seqfan] A063232 and A063243 (both by NJAS).

L. Edson Jeffery lejeffery2 at gmail.com
Sun May 3 01:03:40 CEST 2015


In A063232, if the g.f. is conjectured, then perhaps it should be stated as
such. Otherwise, the proof might shed light on whether or not the g.f.
conjectured in A063243 is correct since they are the same g.f.. Since the
sequences agree for the terms shown, maybe the two should be
cross-referenced.

https://oeis.org/A063232

https://oeis.org/A063243

Ed Jeffery



More information about the SeqFan mailing list