[seqfan] Re: A066077

Frank Adams-Watters franktaw at netscape.net
Thu Dec 28 03:22:09 CET 2017

I have to wonder that the original sequence actually was. Note that it is monotonic, so it undoubtedly has some meaning.

Maybe we should mark it "unkn', and enter the corrected values as a new equence.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Wed, Dec 27, 2017 7:43 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A066077

I think this is a case where we have to change the data to fit the definition.  There's no other solution

More information about the SeqFan mailing list