[seqfan] Re: A066077
franktaw at netscape.net
Thu Dec 28 03:22:09 CET 2017
I have to wonder that the original sequence actually was. Note that it is monotonic, so it undoubtedly has some meaning.
Maybe we should mark it "unkn', and enter the corrected values as a new equence.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
From: Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Wed, Dec 27, 2017 7:43 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A066077
I think this is a case where we have to change the data to fit the definition. There's no other solution
More information about the SeqFan