[seqfan] Authorship of b-files
N. J. A. Sloane
njas at research.att.com
Thu Aug 18 05:45:41 CEST 2011
Authorship of b-files
Dear Editors-in-Chief and Sequence Fans:
Tony Noe points out that there is a problem with the authorship of b-files. He says:
"Everything else about OEIS seems to follow the fairly nice mathematical authorship rules.
But as practiced now, anyone can add one term (I have seen this) to a b-file and
change the author to themselves. I propose that if someone creates a
b-file and later someone adds to that b-file, then both authors should appear.
I think it would be easy for the editors to enforce this rule."
I agree that this is a problem. In fact when someone adds terms to an
existing b-file, both - or all - author's names should appear.
Something like this could be our model:
A, B and C, <a href ....>Table ...< /a > [Terms 1 through 50 were computed by A, terms 51 through 60 by B, and term 61 by C]
or perhaps even better:
A, B and C, <a href ....>Table ...< /a > [Terms 1 through 50 were computed by A, Jul 01 2003; terms 51 through 60 by B, Aug 01 2004; and term 61 by C, Aug 17 2011]
I will add something like this to the Instruction Page for B-files next week,
when I return home.
More information about the SeqFan