[seqfan] Re: XronoMorph - Overlaid polygons and music
charles.greathouse at case.edu
Tue Jul 19 14:29:21 CEST 2016
Perhaps being about half binomial(2^16, 3) means that the author reduced
for reversal but not for circular shifts?
Case Western Reserve University
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bob Selcoe <rselcoe at entouchonline.net>
> Hi Charles,
> I think the article may be wrong; the way it's worded suggests 3
> overlapping rhythms with any combination of 16 "taps" allowed for each
> rhythm; presuming there are no repeated rhythms allowed (standard with
> polyrhythms) then we have (2^16-1)*(2^15-1)*(2^14-1) ~ 35 trillion
> combinations. I guess the author sees this as divided by 2 (around 2^44
> instead of 2^45) but I'm not sure why.
> Bob Selcoe
> From: "Charles Greathouse" <charles.greathouse at case.edu>
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 11:33 PM
> To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Subject: [seqfan] XronoMorph - Overlaid polygons and music
> I found an interesting article:
>> It discusses music generated from fairly simple mathematical structures:
>> (small) subsets of the vertices of a polygon. Each subset is displayed as
>> polygon of a different color.
>> From the article: "There are more than 17 trillion different rhythms, and
>> that is only counting rhythms with three levels where every beat occurs at
>> one of 16 distinct time locations (16 being a very common temporal
>> subdivision in music)."
>> I'm trying to figure out how this number is computed. I've tried a few
>> different ways but none are close enough. binomial(2^16, 3) is too big,
>> reducing it by circular shift makes it a bit more than 1/16th the size
>> which is too small. Any ideas? (I assume that by "more than 17 trillion"
>> they mean between 17e12 and 18e12.)
>> Charles Greathouse
>> Case Western Reserve University
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan