[seqfan] Re: A159848 and A162402 are the same

Leroy Quet q1qq2qqq3qqqq at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 17 17:35:49 CEST 2009

Darn it. I calculate my sequences by hand, not even using a calculator. I am also error-prone -- that is why I don't submit many terms. So, probably all my sequences that have not yet been extended should be checked.

Sorry everybody, thanks,
Leroy Quet

--- On Fri, 7/17/09, Prof. Dr. Alois Heinz <heinz at hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:

> From: Prof. Dr. Alois Heinz <heinz at hs-heilbronn.de>
> Subject: A159848 and A162402 are the same
> To: seqfan at seqfan.eu, njas at research.att.com
> Cc: reinhard.zumkeller at gmail.com, q1qq2qqq3qqqq at yahoo.com
> Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 2:17 PM
> Both sequences are essentially the
> same (with an offset of 1):
> http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A159848
> http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A162402
> In A162402 a(7)=8 is not correct, it should be 6+3=9.
> Later values are also not correct.
> I vote for deletion of A162402 and A162403 which depends
> on A162402.
> (The correct version of A162403 is already in the OEIS:
> A159849)
> Alois


More information about the SeqFan mailing list