[seqfan] Re: Some sequences relating to Goldbach's conjecture

Jeremy Gardiner jeremy.gardiner at btinternet.com
Fri Apr 10 10:54:17 CEST 2009

Personally I would have gone with the "less" option, as I hate throwing
things away. But it's a pity the author didn't provide an explanation of why
he considers these sequences interesting, such as a link to a published
paper; or to publish a paper to prove his point!


On 9/4/09 23:02, "franktaw at netscape.net" <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:

> Certainly this is possible, but I don't think it's really very likely 
> anyone will add similar sequences in the future.  There are to my 
> no other sequences organized like these in the database, 
although there are
> others that could just as easily be added with such 
an arrangement

> course, at this point the final decision is up to Neil.
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
> Original Message -- From: Benoît Jubin
> I recommend removing the lot of them, unless someone can explain why
> one or more of these presentations is especially interesting.
> Is it possible instead to add the keyword "less" to these sequences?

More information about the SeqFan mailing list