[seqfan] Re: A000207: Maple-Program wrong
Peter Luschny
peter.luschny at googlemail.com
Sun Apr 19 23:18:24 CEST 2009
Hi Rainer,
> Do you think it would be an interesting comment that
> lim{n->oo} A000207(n+1)/A000207(n) = 4
Well, why not?
> or is this an immediate consequence for the learned reader ..?
If you want to avoid Stirling's formula you can find here some other
helpful formulas which give you this consequence:
http://www.luschny.de/math/factorial/approx/SimpleCases.html
And then you might want to find out how good this approximation
to A000207(n+1)/A000207(n) is:
U := proc(n) 4 - (10/n)*(1-(3/n)*(1-(3/n)*(1-(3/n))*(1-(3/n))
*(1-(3/n))*(1-(3/n))*(1-(3/n)))) end;
Cheers Peter
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list