[seqfan] Re: A104851

N. J. A. Sloane njas at research.att.com
Sun Feb 5 21:19:52 CET 2012

> it turns out that
A198176 is the same as the corrected A104851.  It also turns out that
A198176 was submitted by me!  Should A104851 be deleted?

No, the usual procedure is to correct the older sequence
- giving yourself credit, of course - and
to delete the newer one.

Yes, this makes it seem that you submitted a duplicate,
but no one will blame you!

Don't forget, please, to update the Deleted Sequences
page on the wiki. (Incidentally you will see there
several examples where the same thing has happened to me,
I've deleted my own contributions because they turned
out to be correct versions of earlier incorrect
submissions by others!)

 Best regards

More information about the SeqFan mailing list