[seqfan] Re: A089755

Frank Adams-Watters franktaw at netscape.net
Fri Sep 18 05:53:41 CEST 2015


Maybe; but in fact the values in the database include single-digit values - just not in the first place they could go. That's the problem.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 10:47 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A089755


Let's not be hasty. I think the intention is that each term should have at
least
two digits. Let's try to make some small adjustments to the
definition so that
it matches the terms.


That's always been the OEIS policy: when in doubt,
preserve the sequence
itself .


Can you please submit your version as a new
sequence, and
give cross-references linking them?

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A.
Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ
08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University,
Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email:
njasloane at gmail.com


On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Frank Adams-Watters
<franktaw at netscape.net
> wrote:

> This sequence does not match its definition
(see
> https://oeis.org/draft/A089755). There is no definition I can see that
it
> does follow - it appears to have been miscalculated by hand. What should
we
> do with it?
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list -
http://list.seqfan.eu/
>

_______________________________________________

Seqfan
Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

 


More information about the SeqFan mailing list