[seqfan] Re: LRS formulas for n>=...?
franktaw at netscape.net
franktaw at netscape.net
Mon Aug 3 23:48:49 CEST 2009
This strikes me as a bit excessive -- and yet, there is something
missing.
What's missing is the array by antidiagonals: T(n,k) is the number of n
x k matrices with the specified condition.
I would have added that, the main diagonal sequence, and rows 2 (where
appropriate, otherwise 3) through 4 (instead of rows 2 or 3 through 10,
as is present now).
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: rhhardin at att.net
> A163002-A163154 are the same computation without the <=2 adjacent
A163054, that should be.
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list