[seqfan] Re: A180268
apovolot at gmail.com
Mon Aug 23 23:32:41 CEST 2010
Or may be I should (following the "Naked King" plot say in my last
sentence of my previous email
"...and therefor DO GET POSTED" ;-) "
On 8/23/10, Alexander P-sky <apovolot at gmail.com> wrote:
> This *summer hours campaign * OEIS submission and acceptance policy
> (similarly as it was during other similar *campaigns* ) in its
> Kafka-like reality looks to me as follows:
> People who care about *campaign* do not submit (by applying
> self-censorship and self-restrain) and therefor do not get posted
> while people who do not care about *campaign* do submit and therefor
> do not get posted.
> On 8/23/10, Klaus Brockhaus <klaus-brockhaus at t-online.de> wrote:
>> Charles Greathouse schrieb:
>>> Is there any reason to think this is an interesting sequence?
>> I just checked, it because it has been submitted and accepted (during
>> the summer hours).
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan