[seqfan] Re: Oh, To Offend
David Newman
davidsnewman at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 06:01:55 CET 2010
If we can have "obscene" numbers then they should probably be associated
with "invective" functions.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Robert G. Wilson v <rgwv at rgwv.com> wrote:
> Oh it reminds me of the fickle finger of fate of Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In.
> But shouldn't the next two adjacent two digits be zeros?
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:17 PM
> To: <seqfan at seqfan.eu>
> Cc: <njas at research.att.com>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: Oh, To Offend
>
> > %N A175262 "Obscene numbers": Those positive integers that when written
> in
> > binar
> > y contain an odd number of digits, the middle digit being a 1.
> > %N A175263 "Prudish numbers": Those positive integers that when written
> in
> > binary contain an odd number of digits, the middle digit being a 0.
> >
> >
> > Leroy, I don't object to giving names to sequences
> > if they are really clever. But I'm not sure these
> > meet that requirement! And the definitions seem
> > quite artificial.
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> > Neil
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list