[seqfan] Re: A103807 and negative primes
Maximilian Hasler
maximilian.hasler at gmail.com
Sun Mar 21 16:40:49 CET 2010
how about : "are prime(s) (in absolute value)" ?
i.e. in this concrete case:
%N A103807 Primes p such that 2*p-27, 2*p+27, 2*p-33 and 2*p+33 are
primes (in absolute value).
(I think it is preferrable (creates less confusion) to put it in
parentheses because it concens only a negligible number of terms, and
accoding to personal preference of the reader it might not be
necessary, but it is there for those who want it to be there.)
Maximilian
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:28 PM, N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com> wrote:
>> I personally prefer "negative prime"
> but don't mind if you use "negative value of prime".
>
> Zak, I agree, but it is still not quite perfect.
>
> How about: .... are of the form +-q, where q is a prime.
>
> Neil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list